Poor camera Information makes this comparison stink
This comparison is f*&%$*& stupid. What jackass made up all this B.S. (wrong) facts and post it. The 20D is a great camera but its in NO league with the 5D. Yes its faster but there is so much more information that was disregarded. Such as the 5D being engineered for professionals, and the fact it gathers 40% more light and can use lower ISO's inherently. And that it has a more powerful CMOS, broader dynamic color gamut, higher 'definition' sensor with lower SNR than the 20D. You must compare more than the weight and the lack of a flash. There is a reason. This comparison is like a ford pinto vs. a corvette and giving it to the pinto! Goto dpreview.com for 'real' facts.
2
people have this problem
I have this problem, too!
Tell me when someone solves it.
The more people who report this problem, the more it gets noticed.
The more people who report this problem, the more it gets noticed.
The company marked this problem solved.
-
Inappropriate?Yeah thats a bit embarrassing. You and some other people have pointed out some major issues with our comparison algorithm, we're working on it, thanks.
It looks like our algorithm picks the 20D because of its flash, though it does score the 5D better on low light capability (because of its larger sensor and the fact that its CMOS).
I’m confident we'll improve
-
Inappropriate?We've launched a huge update to http://snapsort.com, read more here:
http://blog.snapsort.com/2010/06/snap...
Would love to hear your thoughts on it - hopefully it doesn't 'stink' as much as you felt the previous site did.
The company says
this solves the problem
Loading Profile...




EMPLOYEE